In: Articles by Chris "FighterAce100" Salazar
16 Jul 2010
Oh yeah, let’s get excited! Kinect is coming out for the Xbox 360 in the coming fall, but how excited should we really be?
Ever since I saw the previews of “Project Natal,” I knew for certain that I had to have that addition to my 360, but now, after seeing the release games, I’m not so certain.
Kinect promises to revolutionize the 360 platform by allowing the user to play games without using a traditional controller. Wait, what?! Yeah, that sounds so awesome to think that you can play a game purely off a motion sensor knowing where your body parts are!
Let’s think about that for a minute. Sure, Kinect has awesome potential for sports games like tennis, bowling, ping pong and the like, but what about other games. Surely you can’t put all that money into making this product and its limits are what I would like to call “kiddy games.” Yes I said it: Kiddy games!
I like to shoot people, throw explosives, race my self-tuned Subaru STi or Nissan GT-R on Laguna Seca, and explore on other worlds while playing as Commander Shepard in Mass Effect or as my created character in Dragon Age. Let’s think about the potential for the serious gamer and not a family full of kids that are in fifth grade.
Imagine, you have your Kinect system plugged in and you are about to play Modern Warfare 3 or Battlefield Bad Company 3. How would one hold his weapon? Sure, I can pretend to hold a M4 in my hands, maybe make a cardboard cut-out for added realism or use an airsoft rifle or paintball replica, but what about moving? “Grenade… Take cover! RPG!…” Oh damn, I gotta jump under my TV and hope not to hit my head on some object in my living room — or worse, I have to clean out my entire living room just so I can do the movements necessary to play the game. Is this what we’ve come to?
What about basic movement, especially running? Sure, everyone knows in the exercise games we move our legs to pretend we are running in the same spot for five minutes and it gives you some kind of workout, but can you do this for hours while playing online multiplayer?
Kinect has tons of promise, though, especially for racing games and the traditional exercise workout games. I would love to be able to shift and use a clutch like I do in my actual car. I’d like to look to the side turning my head a little to see the sideview mirrors and yank the E-brake to pull a wicked drift on a corner. I can also see lots of potential for boxing games like Fight Night and, to a point, UFC, although it would be hard to pin someone to end the round.
So gamers, what is your take on Kinect? Is it just to bust the Nintendo Wii Sports and assorted “kiddy games” or does it have real potential to bring the next level of gaming to your living room with all game styles? Can the Kinect system withstand growing outside of the small box that it has been created in so that I can look forward to playing my RPGs and FPSes without a controller? Who knew the couch could be “outdated?”
Bringing you the latest in news, GameHounds delivers an adult perspective on the video game business and culture.
This podcast is explicit and is intended for adults ages 18 and older.
7 Responses to Kinect: Endless Potential… or Epic Fail?
Troy
July 16th, 2010 at 3:30 pm
I think that if Microsoft took it seriously for the hardcore and put Kinect software into hardcore games that allowed you to sit down while playing it that it could be taken as something more than just the wii without the remote. In the meanwhile its still just a kiddy game.
yami
July 16th, 2010 at 5:47 pm
Kinect seems to be a upgrade to the Eyetoy. I don’t know how big it can get, but i know, like the Eyetoy, it has a lot of limitations, and is given only so many genres it can play well. It is obvious that Microsoft can make hardcore games for, especially if you see the Eyetoy, Dance Dance Revolution, Kinetic and Anti Grav were some hardcore games with Eyetoy, showing Kinect is definitely possible, but its all up to Microsoft. Sure, Kinect has potential in most ways, seeming like its less for games and more for media or the dashboard, and it seems as if it were just an add on for games, similar to sixaxis for PS3, Kinect is something i would like to add maybe more interaction or commands to games, but not to play games entirely with, like forza. But, i’m sure Microsoft can innovate in games with it, but nothing they have shown looks amazing at all, most of it seems able to work with the PlayStation Eye for PS3, and the only games i actually found interesting to get for Kinect is Dance Central and Sonic Riders, which are both possible on PS3, with the PlayStation Eye.
Chris "FighterAce100" Salazar
July 17th, 2010 at 12:04 am
Yami I think you point out a excellent connection between exsisting tech thats been out for a while and what we are just beginning to see with the xbox. I think its intresting that Playstation has had something similar out already, although without as many features as the Kinect System. This is why I am becoming more skeptical with the Microsoft system as the 360 is supposed to be the “cutting edge” system out there like the PS3 or the Wii and you would expect the same for anything new that gets added to the system. I can’t put out my ultimate judgement for it yet though, as I havn’t had the opportunity to try it out but we’ll see how it pans out.
Troy, I think that Microsoft hopefully has the hardcore gamer in mind for atleast some sort of functionality with FPS style games. I think they would be hurting themselves big time if they think they can put all this hype and money into something that only works on “kiddy games” and not spark interest with developers that make games like Battlefield and Modern Warfare. I would consider it a complete waste of time and money if they don’t do something about developing something else for it that attracts adults who don’t have kids and want to do more than move their hands to browse through Netflix movies or soundtracks on their system.
daddygamer
July 17th, 2010 at 11:10 am
Come on, Chris! Use your imagination! As a hardcore MW2 player, Kinect will totally kickass. I can’t wait to use it.
Here are some potential MW2/FPS commands:
-Throw grenade - make fist and make throwing motion
-Duck - squat
-Prone - lie down on belly
-change weapon - shake head
-reload - put arms on hips and shake hips left to right
-access killstreak - do the Macarena
-call for pavelow - do lasso motion with right hand after the macarena
-call for C130 - do lasso motion with both hands while shaking hips after the macarena…
Can you see the possibilities now?
(disclaimer: i have not seen sunlight for about a week and i am on crack)
Chris "FighterAce100" Salazar
July 18th, 2010 at 9:01 pm
Daddygamer I can see how some of those would work and be fun and creative ways to let it work however I don’t think the majority of the community who play these games make that a realistic way to play the game. As in real combat, whoever ends up thinking and doing the fastest ends up with the best result. Example, just like the wild west, if you can draw faster than the other guy, he is not going to have a good day. The same holds true here and lets not forget, most of us do not want to end up getting a workout from playing a FPS or having a horrible time because someone is more in shape than another player. Thats why they made the exercise games. I can see the two shades of the story here but I still don’t see how it is possible to play a FPS or a RPG without the controller.
Do I like to sit on the couch for hours? No not always but I don’t want to have a thought in the back of my head go like this: “Man I don’t want to play Battlefield tonight..running for 3 hours and having to squat and duck all the time just doesn’t seem fun right now. What I really need is a game that lets me sit on the couch and just lets me relax with only my hands in use…you know…old skool gaming. Lets go back to… (Some really old game).”
jovlem
July 20th, 2010 at 5:44 am
This is how shooters might work with Kinect:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=as4SlcAExwc
You stil use a normal controller and you can switch any time between “normal” dual sticks mode and motion controls.
daddygamer
July 20th, 2010 at 9:48 am
hahhahaha Chris. I meant all of my comment in jest. It’s my long way of saying Kinect will be krap and will not be taken seriously by any hardcore gamer.